Research project · Early days

What makes an organization work?

Great individuals don’t automatically make a great team. We’re exploring what does — with people, AI agents, and everyone in between.

See what we’re testing
Three ways to organize01 / 03
HUMANHYBRIDAGENTIC
Different kinds of teams. Surprisingly similar puzzles.

Smart individuals don’t automatically make a smart organization. So what does?

What we study

Different teams.
Same puzzles.

Who decides? Who knows what? What happens when things go wrong? With AI agents, we can now test questions like these in ways that weren’t practical before.

01 / Human

Human organizations

How people divide work, build trust, make decisions, and develop ways of working that stick.

02 / Hybrid

Human × agent

What happens when some of your colleagues are agents? Where should judgment, control, and accountability sit?

03 / Agentic

Agentic organizations

Can teams of AI agents find effective ways to work, recover from mistakes, and improve as they grow?

Research approach

Build it. Test it.
Learn something.

We test ideas in controlled settings, watch what happens over time, then ask whether the lessons hold up with real teams. No magic formula — just better evidence.

Lab A

Organizational Wind Tunnel

Change a rule, rerun the task, compare the results. What happens when you tweak hierarchy, autonomy, or access to information?

Lab B

Artificial Enterprise

Give artificial teams budgets, customers, and unexpected problems. See whether their way of working holds up.

Lab C

Living Organizations

Find out what carries over to human and hybrid teams — and what doesn’t. People aren’t just slower agents.

Proposed first study

Does a “way of working” really change anything?

Start with four artificial teams doing the same work. Give each a different guiding principle: move fast, put customers first, check the evidence, or just get the job done. Then compare what happens.

We’re more interested in the trade-offs than a winner’s podium. Does speed create mistakes? Does caution pay for itself? Does anyone actually follow the rules?

Neutral baseline
Speed First
Customer First
Evidence First

A proposed experiment. Results have yet to be collected.

How we work

Good experiments beat good slogans.

We’ll share methods, measure outcomes carefully, and be clear about what we don’t know. An interesting result in a simulation isn’t automatically a lesson for people.

Get in touch

Curious? So are we.

We’re putting AOLab together. If you’re researching multi-agent systems, studying organizations, or experimenting with new ways of working, we’d love to compare notes.

aolab@oxford.ai